Hi guys I'm trying to test latest owb, maybe I'm doing something wrong, I've to do something before running it? On my hosted (the one I use to test the ports) it will just crash if launched as-is

In JanusUAE it has always been that way. At least since I first used it several years ago.

deadwood, if you iconify JanusUAE, but it has also happened with other Applications, the name of the iconify Icon has strange fonts, see screnshot.

[quote name=deadwood post=6474]@deadwood - What total score did you get? It's was at the top of the page, above the details you pasted.[/quote] ok deadwood

Test of 64 bit version of linux hosted on three different machines

@ntromans Thanks. ~20 for Speedometer is similar to mine, so your web browing should be okish and not as bad as motionmark would suggest. For Octane, please give it time - even up to 10 minutes. That's how slow it can compute without JIT.

[quote name=deadwood post=6469]@deadwood - I think it's rather the benchmark failing for some reason on your setup. Did you actually see animations during tests or did you see "still frames"?[/quote] Yes the animations played, mostly quite quickly too. On my i5 machine: the Octane benchmarjk locks up OWB at the zlib test., the benchmark for Kraken is attached. The third test is 19.7 runs per minute +/- 0.26 Cheers, Nigel.

What total score did you get? It's was at the top of the page, above the details you pasted.

Kraken v1.1 on samsung nc10 aros native atom

deadwood, I don't know if this is one of the things to do On www.deepl.com Copy-Paste does not work, not even through (Win+V key, Win+C key), if you use 'Paste' from the OWB menu you get a Guru! The Traduzuine Window is also reduced

MotionMark on Samsun NC10 Aros native 32 bit Atom

I found three other benchmarks that possibly give more predictable results. Please try them: [url]https://chromium.github.io/octane/[/url] [url]https://mozilla.github.io/krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/kraken-1.1/driver.html[/url] [url]https://browserbench.org/Speedometer2.0/[/url] First two are pure CPU benchmarks, the third is an use experience benchmark. Here are my results (64-bit version, linux hosted):

I think it's rather the benchmark failing for some reason on your setup. Did you actually see animations during tests or did you see "still frames"?

On 2.5 GHz i5 HP EliteBook 8470p native attached. So does running VESA graphics really slow things down that much? Cheers, Nigel.

again yahoo mail works fine there are no more browser crashes I can safely download attachments and change the message numbering page

On my HP Z400 native mode 32 bit

With FireFox on the same DualCore PC, I only found that it was twice as fast as WMware (60-fps/160.58) ! On the Small Netbook Acer Aspire One ZG5 512MB RAM, see screenshot !

result on firefox

Whoa, I didn't expect that. So what result does your native browser on that hardware?

64bit linux hosted (WSL2 Windows 11)