A more updated version of AmiTCP is available and it's open. I'm starting this thread for any potential interest in AROS, which currently still has an outdated TCP stack. Thanks to the active programmers who help us, I have been a user for many years.

https://www.amiga...36-EN.html

@Amiwell79

As far as I know many of these „new“ things are already implemented in AROSTCP if I‘m looking at the following Link:

https://github.co...ki/AROSTCP

As far as I know, I can't get a download rate higher than 400kbs, so there must be something wrong with our stack, but I could be wrong

@Amiwell79

The link that I provided is for the main branch of AROS ABIv1 which is a few months ahead of Deadwood‘s ABIv11.

You can test a nightly build of AROS ABI v1.

I understand, let's hope something is done for our beloved platform, of course without rushing and if there is any interest, bye

@Amiwell79

Actually it would be great if you could test the nightly build from www.aros.org. If you get better transfer speeds with that build I would be a clear indication to me that either there are some improvements there in the newer codebase or that I made a mistake with synchronization of existing codebase. Either way we learn something.

ok, I'll test the build when I have a working 64-bit system. Right now I don't have one, but I could try the 32-bit build

Yup, 32-bit should be ok as well I think. Network shouldn't behave different 32-bit vs 64-bit.

ok deadwood

Yes, Kalamatee made some improvements at the start of the year that give a huge improvement to transfer speeds over broadband in tests I did at the time. I haven't been following ABIv11 developments closely enough to know if they have been ported over already, but I hope to repeat the tests with ABIv11 soon.

In short, we've always had pretty good speeds over LAN, but speeds were often very slow over broadband until these improvements.

I read yesterday in the other thread about what Nick posted and the improvements to the stack, also with Windows and Linux, I don't have any problems even with Wi-Fi, with AROS unfortunately no.

@ncafferkey

Most likely they have not been ported yet (synchronization point is 2026-02-02). If you have time to investigate and these changes are isolated (can be applied on currect codebase without bring in the complete network stack overhaul/IPv6 work) I'd love to have them included prior to the release still (or I can do the porting if you can point me to the needed changes)

Grazie Deadwood!

@deadwood

I don't have time to dig into it unfortunately, but looking at the commits in the AROSTCP directory, this commit looks like it could be the bulk of it:

https://github.co...2e263526b4

With AROS One 64-bit v11 Native on my old ACER Aspire 5920 laptop connected to the Internet
via an old cell phone using USB tethering, I’m getting a speed of 20.4 Mbps, which is a decent speed.

Surely, with an Ethernet connection or USB tethering using a modern cell phone,
the connection would be much faster.

If, as I’ve read, there have been developments to improve connection speed, it will certainly increase.

I’m attaching a screenshot of the speed test.

@AMIGASYSTEM

Interesting. Do you get similar download speeds for file downloads?

They should be the ones shown in the graphic; I think the download is pretty fast!

my internet data

There's still some confusion, Nick's fixes still need to be applied

I repeat, I'm not a new user. I'll give an example: the only cloud service supported by OWB that I use for uploads gives me a maximum speed of an old 56k modem. It's different with other operating systems, but I use AROS because it helps me with my health problems. It seems bizarre, but that's how it is.